His towering simplicity is revealed in his final writings, when he analysed the transient nature of his achievements. He acknowledged that his two sons who had settled abroad would have a limited connection to his last moments in India. He observed that the digital traces he left behind would serve as mere “remembrances” rather than true imprints of his life’s essence. He wrote about a “delirious moment of bliss” in between moments of life and death. His writings at times were “metaphysical”.
Supporting young scholars
I met him for the first time in 2015 at the India International Centre (IIC) at the IIC Saturday Discussion Club, where I am a member. He was then a Member of the newly-created NITI AAYOG (erstwhile Planning Commission). I still remember vividly how he articulated the organisational chart of Niti Aayog and how it was made dynamic at the lower rungs by appointing significant numbers of young professionals/scholars on priority. He also made it a point to edit a book then, titled India 2047: Voices of the young based on the contributions by the young professionals/scholars at NITI Aayog. I asked him the questions that related to the significance of integrating a “gender lens” in the macroeconomic policy processes. Though he accepted that my question has many layers, he left it there, acknowledging that these issues will be given importance in the Niti Aayog then, which he did later.
Firm opinion on Centre-State financial relations
My second meeting with him was again at IIC at the book release function of former Central Bank Governor Dr YV Reddy’s Indian Fiscal Federalism (co-authored with Dr GR Reddy) organised by ICRIER when they invited me on the panel chaired by Dr Debroy.
Dr Isher Judge Ahluwalia (late) and I were the women panellists, along with Dr NK Singh and Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia. Fiscal federalism, as always, was a sensitive area of policy debate. In the function, he shared Dr YV Reddy’s concern that something “fundamental” was happening in Indian fiscal federalism post institutional changes such as the abolition of the Planning Commission, the creation of the National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog, the constitutional amendment to introduce the Goods and Services Tax (GST), the establishment of the GST Council, and the historically high tax devolution to the states based on the 14th Finance Commission’s recommendations.
Heated debates were there about a few issues on Indian Fiscal Federalism, where Dr Debroy led the discussions including: whether or not to make Finance Commissions “permanent” or to abolish them by making the tax devolution share constant through a constitutional amendment; the need for an institution to redress spatial inequalities in order to fill the vacuum created by abolishing the Planning Commission; and making the case for Article 282 of the constitution to be circumscribed.
Bibek da acknowledged the significance of “Seventh Schedule” of the Constitution (the Union List, State List and Concurrent List) and its efficacy for the Finance Commissions. He was also very concerned about the plausibility of intergovernmental fiscal transfers under Article 282. He will be missed in the fiscal federal forums when India will engage in heated debates on Centre-State financial relations.
A believer of the “Beyond GDP” paradigm
It was my honour and absolute privilege when a Dr Debroy-led panel selected me for the Skoch Indian Economic Policy Forum award (independent award) for Macroeconomics in 2023 for my work on “macroeconomics, gender and unpaid care economy research and policies”.
At that function, in his speech, he raised the significance of going “Beyond (the) GDP” paradigm and the need to formulate the human development related policies to ensure the graduation of India into a high-income country. His vision for Viksit Bharat incorporates sustainable human development and climate resilience.
His engagement with policy think-tanks
Dr Debroy was a former member of the Governing Board of NIPFP (independent research institute of Ministry of Finance, Govt of India) where I am currently working.
NIPFP had a major project with the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council (PM-EAC) on the “State of the Economy” quarterly inputs while Dr Pinaki Chakraborty was the NIPFP Director and I was a team member working on the modules related to the monetary policy and interest rate determination. His engagement with our policy think-tank and his support as Chairman, PM-EAC was immense. The policy co-ordination between monetary and fiscal authorities was what he highlighted in the meetings, amidst the poly crisis, pandemic and geo-political uncertainties. The NIPF –PMEAC project with him on the “State of the Economy” project was evidence-based policy research based on high-frequency data.
Economics and literature links
I followed him on Twitter. On Twitter, his last photograph was with his wife, near a painting, with his tweet reading: “Thank you @beena1869 for this wonderful painting. Bhairava arrives in our house on a Saturday”.
